Analisis Framing Dan Retorika dalam Teks Pidato Menteri Luar Negeri RI Terkait Isu Kemanusiaan di Palestina Tahun 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study focuses on the analysis of rhetoric and framing in the speeches of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Retno Marsudi, delivered at two major international forums in 2024, namely the United Nations Security Council Open Debate and the International Court of Justice. Using a qualitative approach grounded in the interpretive paradigm, this research employs Ibnu Hamad's framing analysis to understand how the Minister of Foreign Affairs constructs discourse related to humanitarian issues in Palestine. Pathos rhetoric serves as a key element in the speech text, used to evoke the audience's emotions and influence their perception of human rights issues in the Israel-Palestine conflict. The analysis results reveal that Minister Retno Marsudi’s speeches highlight verbal and non-verbal symbols that reinforce Indonesia's solidarity with Palestine. The use of emotional language, quotes from Israeli officials, and symbolic attributes like the keffiyeh support the framing aimed at portraying Israel as the primary perpetrator of humanitarian crimes. Strategic fact presentation is also employed to emphasize the United Nations Security Council's failure to enforce resolutions against Israel. Priming is conducted by selecting critical moments to maximize the audience's attention to the delivered message. This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of humanitarian diplomacy through state speeches. However, the effectiveness of the pathos rhetoric used needs further examination by observing the audience's direct responses. This research is expected to contribute to the development of political communication studies, particularly in the context of framing and rhetoric in state speech texts.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ariely, G. (2018). Political Culture and Israeli Politics. In R. Y. Hazan, A. Dowty, M. Hofnung, & G. Rahat (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Israeli Politics and Society (pp. 596–615). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190675585.013.36_update_001
Bimo, E. S. (2024). Kantor HAM PBB Umumkan Perluasan Permukiman Ilegal Israel di Tepi Barat Adalah Kejahatan Perang. Kompas TV. https://www.kompas.tv/internasional/491318/kantor-ham-pbb-umumkan-perluasan-permukiman-ilegal-israel-di-tepi-barat-adalah-kejahatan-perang
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Cătău-Vereș, D. (2020). Persuasive Discursive Elements in the Public Relations Campaign of Image Reconstruction: Logos, Ethos and Pathos. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 7(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.1/112
Chesebro, J. W., & Borisoff, D. J. (2007). What Makes Qualitative Research Qualitative? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430701617846
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Conforti, Y. (2021). The cultural origins of Jewish nationalism : Early Zionism and the weight of the pre-modern tradition. Studies in Ethinicity and Nationalism, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12356
D’angelo, P. (2019). Framing Theory and Journalism. In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies (Vol. 2002, pp. 1–10). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021
de Vreese, C. H., & Lecheler, S. (2016). Framing Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (pp. 1–10). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc121
Dostri, O. (2023). Hamas ’ s October 2023 Attack on Israel The End of the Deterrence Strategy in Gaza. NOVEMBER, 1–13.
Dwiastuti, I. (2021). The Roots of Israel-Palestine Conflict: A Political Culture Analysis. AEGIS : Journal of International Relations, 4(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v4i2.796
Fikry, A. (2020). Representasi Konsep Retorika Persuasif Aristoteles dalam Pidato Ismail Haniyah untuk Umat Islam Indonesia. JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA, 5(3), 137. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v5i3.387
Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks. (2019). A First Look at Communication Theory. In McGraw Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315684635-12
Hamad, I. (2010). Komunikasi Sebagai Wacana (N. Hifni (ed.); 1st ed.). La Tofi Enterprise.
Harvey, J. (2023). Timeline of conflict between Israel and Palestinians in Gaza. Reuters.
Hollstein, B. (2011). Qualitative approaches. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 404–416.
Kurniawati, E. (2019). Kontroversi Tiruan Slogan Donald Trump dalam Pidato Pipres Prabowo: Analisis Framing dalam Tiga Media Online. Kalijaga Journal of Communication, 1(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.14421/kjc.12.01.2019
Noor Fahmi Pramuji. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Turkey’s Foreign Policy Toward The Middle East: A Case of Palestine Issue. JILS (Journal of International and Local Studies), 4(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.56326/jils.v4i1.717
Raby, S. (2023). The humanitarian crisis of the Israeli occupation and settler colonialism in the West Bank and Gaza. Eastern Michigan University.
Rosvina, S., Darmawan, A., & Herlina Kusumaningrum. (2023). Analisis Framing Citra Politik Eri Cahyadi Dalam Program Perkuat Pelayanan Di Garda Terdepan Pada Akun Instagram @Ericahyadi_. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Komunikasi.
Rousseau, E., & Pende, A. S. (2020). Humanitarian Diplomacy. In Global Diplomacy (pp. 253–266). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28786-3_18
Sagoo, R. (2024). South Africa’s genocide case against Israel: The International Court of Justice explained. Chatham House.
Searle, J. (2014). Stanley Cavell Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy. In Philosophy in America (1st ed., pp. 72–95). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315830636-11
Simon, N. (2020). Investigating Ethos and Pathos in Scientific Truth Claims in Public Discourse. Media and Communication, 8(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i1.2444
Siregar, A. K., & Qurniawati, E. F. (2022). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Buzzer di tempo.co. Journal of New Media and Communication, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55985/jnmc.v1i1.1
Strozier, C. B. (2024). The apocalyptic aims of Hamas. Psychoanalysis, Self and Context, 19(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2023.2292052
Syaefudin, M., Handayani, A. D., & Nisa, R. (2024). Analisis Framing Artikel Nadiem Makarim di cnnindonesia.com: Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan Seksual di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi. ORASI: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 15(1), 94–108.
Waruwu, S. (2022). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dengan Teknik M3 (Mengamati, Menirukan, Memodifikasi) Untuk meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Teks Pidato. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i1.57