The Impact of Gartic.io-Based Pictionary Game on Students’ English Vocabulary of SMAN 1 Sakra Timur

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Aug 13, 2024
DOI https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.7031

Main Article Content

Laila Nurizmi
Universitas Hamzanwadi
Laila Wati
Universitas Hamzanwadi
Hajriana Arfah
Universitas Hamzanwadi
M. Adib Nazri
Universitas Hamzanwadi

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the impact of Gartic.io-based Pictionary game on English vocabulary of students at SMAN 1 Sakra Timur. This research used a quantitative method with a true experimental design. The population of the research consisted of eleventh-grade students at SMAN 1 Sakra Timur academic year 2024/2025, with a sample was 36 students for two classes, 18 students in the experimental group (XI 1) and 18 students in the control group (XI 2). Data were collected using multiple-choice tests as pre-tests and post-tests to measure English vocabulary improvement. The data analysis technique used was an independent sample T-test conducted via SPSS version 22. The researcher found a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.317. Since 0.317 > 0.05, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was rejected, and the null hypothesis (Ho) was accepted. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Gartic.io-based Pictionary game does not significantly impact the vocabulary achievement of high school students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurizmi, L., Wati, L., Arfah, H., & Nazri, M. A. (2024). The Impact of Gartic.io-Based Pictionary Game on Students’ English Vocabulary of SMAN 1 Sakra Timur. Journal on Education, 7(1), 4462-4468. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.7031
Issue
Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Journal on Education: Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Akbari, 2015 Z. Akbari Current Challenges in Teaching/Learning English for EFLLearners:school,https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S18 77042815045358
Bakhsh, S.A. (2016). Using games as a tool in teaching vocabulary to young learners. English language teaching. Volume 9, Number 7.
Daulay, S. H., Lubis, Y., Damanik, E. S. D., Wandini, R. R., & Putri, F. A. (2021). Does Pictionary Game effective for students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 13-25.
Dwi, L. E. (2017). Improving students’ vocabulary mastery through Pictionary board game at Grade IV B of Elementary School 36 Pekanbaru. Al-Islah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v9i2.48
Figueroa-Flores, J. F. (2023). The impact of digital games on language learning: A case study of Gartic.io in the classroom. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 145-162.
Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dengan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam
Kartini, I., & Kareviati, E. (2021). The Students' Responses Toward The Implementation Of Pictionary Game In Teaching Vocabulary To The Seventh Grade Students In One Of Junior High School In Cimahi. Project Professional Journal of English Education),4(3),375 http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p375-383.
Marbun, (2021). Development of Educational Game Media Based on Problem- Based Learning in German Language in the First Grade Senior High School Students SMA Negeri 1 Sibolga. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 165-172. ttps://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1678
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Multimedia learning: 25 years of theory and practice.Psychology of learning and motivation, 71, 165-214.
Murti, P., Jabu, B., & Samtidar. (2022). Students’ English speaking difficulties and teachers’ strategies in English teaching: A case study at SMA Negeri
10 Gowa. Performance: Journal of English Education and Literature, 1(1), 50-63.
Nation, I. S. P. (2018). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (3rd ed.).cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (3rd ed.). cambridge University Press.
Newton, J. (2016). Language teaching skills. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 428-440). New York: Routledge.
Peng, S. (2019). A study of the differences between EFL and ESL for English classroom teaching in China. IRA International Journal of Education and MultidisciplinaryStudies,15(1),3235.http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jems.v15.n 1.p4
Peterson, M. (2021). Digital games and language learning: Autonomy and community. ReCALL, 33(2), 176-195.
Peterson, S. N. (2017). Using a modified version of Pictionary to help students review course material. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(3), 10-1128.
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2020). Playful learning: The role of games in education. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1-18.
Polakova, P., & Klimova, B. (2022). Vocabulary mobile learning application in blended English language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 869055.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869055.
Pujari, M., & Luthra, S. (2021). Gamification in language learning: Exploring the impact of digital word games on vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 68-79.
Schmitt, N. (2019). Vocabulary in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2020). Vocabulary in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jILoDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=id&pg=PR7#v=onepage&q&f=false
Siyoto, Sandu dan Ali Sodik.201Dasar Metodologi Penelitian.Yogyakarta:Literasi Media Publishing.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung
:Alfabeta, CV
Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.