Evaluasi Perkembangan Literasi Menulis melalui Analisis Logiko-Semantik: Studi Perbandingan Teks Argumentatif di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the development of students' writing literacy across educational levels. The research questions to be answered are: 1) How does writing literacy, in terms of logico-semantic aspects, develop in argumentative texts between high school students and university students? And 2) Are there significant differences in the logico-semantic structure of argumentative texts between high school students and university students? The method used is a comparative study with high school students and university students as subjects. Data in the form of argumentative paragraph texts were collected and analyzed using logico-semantic analysis, which involves the identification and assessment of the structure and logical relationships between clauses. The results of the study indicate a significant development of writing literacy from high school students to university students, marked by an increase in complexity and variation in the use of logico-semantic relations. University students' texts show better argument quality and coherence. This study suggests the need for systematic development of argumentative writing instruction from school to university, with a focus on strengthening text structure, logic, use of evidence, and more complex use of logico-semantic relations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Chen, H., Lewis, H., & Myhill, D. (2021). Fostering critical reasoning: Developing argumentative competence in early and middle primary years. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 44(2), 46-61.
Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dornbrack, J., & Dixon, K. (2014). Towards a more explicit writing pedagogy: The complexity of teaching argumentative writing. Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 5(1), 1-8.
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar (pp. 192-217). Cammeray, NSW: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Language as social semiotic. The Discourse Studies Reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 263-272.
Halliday, M. A. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and education, 5(2), 93-116.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in english. Routledge.
Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Hasan, R., & Perrett, G. (1994). Learning to function with the other tongue: A systemic functional perspective on second language teaching. Perspectives on pedagogical grammar, 179-226.
Noviandari, N. S. (2019). Logico Semantic Relation Analysis of Clause Complex Based on SFL in CNN News (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Ponorogo).
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language learning, 63, 153-170.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge university press.
Yale University. (n.d.). Argumentative essay rubric. Retrieved August 1, 2024, from https://pier.macmillan.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Argumentative%20essay%20rubric.pdf
Yuniar, R. (2018). Logico-semantic relation of clauses used in analytical exposition written by the third semester students of English department. Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, Language, and Language Teaching, 1(2), 121.