Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dengan Pendekatan Multiliterasi

  • Afifah Azzahra Universitas Indraprasta PGRI (UNINDRA)
  • Irwan Siagian Universitas Indraprasta PGRI (UNINDRA)
Keywords: Multiliteracy, Learning Technology, Digital Literacy

Abstract

Indonesian language learning in the digital era faces the challenges of globalization and rapid technological advancement. The multiliteracy approach emerges as a significant innovation in teaching methods to address these challenges. This approach integrates various types of literacy such as digital literacy, media literacy, visual literacy, and critical literacy to enhance the quality of learning. Through a literature review, this study explores the benefits of the multiliteracy approach in Indonesian language learning. The review results indicate that the use of technology in learning can increase student engagement and enrich their learning experiences. Students who use technology in learning show significant improvements in their literacy skills compared to conventional methods. Furthermore, the role of the teacher as a facilitator is crucial in this approach, where the quality of teaching, the feedback given, and student engagement are key factors influencing learning outcomes. Moreover, digital literacy skills are closely related to communication skills. Students involved in collaborative projects using technology show significant improvements in their writing and speaking abilities. The multiliteracy approach also helps students develop more effective and in-depth communication skills, which are highly needed in the 21st century.

References

Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2021). Online and blended learning: Contexts and conditions for education in an emergency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1301–1305.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Johnson, G. R., & Janzen, M. D. (2023). Leading the Blind: A Critical Look at Visible Learning. Critical Education, 14(4), 23–41.
Lim, F. V. (2023). A Design-Based Research Approach to the Teaching and Learning of Multiliteracies. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(5), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00683-0
Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., Sandiford, C., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Functional grammatics: Re-conceptualizing knowledge about language and image for school English. Routledge.
Mills, K. A., & Exley, B. (2014). Time, Space, and Text in the Elementary School Digital Writing Classroom. Written Communication, 31(4), 434–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314542757
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Warschauer, M. (2013). Technological change and the future of CALL. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms, 27–38.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution tree press.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 487662.
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C.-H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645
Published
2024-08-05
How to Cite
Azzahra, A., & Siagian, I. (2024). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dengan Pendekatan Multiliterasi, 7(1), 3496-3506. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.6944