Blended Learning Stimulating Students’ Activeness in English Teaching Learning Process

Main Article Content

Yasminar Amaerita Telaumbanua
Benifaeri Telaumbanua
Enjel Tris Jelita Telaumbanua
Noniat Zega
Berkris opitama Lase
Ismah Yusuf Tanjung
Arni Yanti Lawolo

Abstract

Student activeness in the learning process is very important because it encourages their deeper and more meaningful engagement with the subject matter. The problem of student activeness in learning is a challenge that is often faced in the world of education, where students are less involved or actively participate in the teaching and learning process. The purpose of this study is to explore how blended learning can stimulate students' activeness especially in the English learning process to class A, sixth semester students of English education study program at University of Nias. To conduct this research, the researchers used a qualitative descriptive method with data collection techniques through interviews. The results of the data obtained about Blended learning stimulating students activeness in English teaching-learning process is Blended learning in English classes enhances students participation and activeness by utilizing online platforms and face to face group for interactive discussions and activities. With the results of this study, it is hoped that the teaching-learning methods carried out can vary and be tailored to the needs and interests of students such as this blended learning method so that students are more enthusiastic and comfortable when learning, especially when the teaching-learning process is taking place.

Article Details

How to Cite
Telaumbanua, Y., Telaumbanua, B., Telaumbanua, E. T. J., Zega, N., opitama Lase, B., Yusuf Tanjung, I., & Yanti Lawolo, A. (2024). Blended Learning Stimulating Students’ Activeness in English Teaching Learning Process. Journal on Education, 7(1), 4437-4447. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.6730
Section
Articles

References

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning - its challenges and future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 93, 612 – 617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
Lalima & Dangwal. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129-136. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Rasimin, R & Yusra, A. (2021). Blended Learning in Increasing Learning Activeness of UNJA Student. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia (JPPK), 10(2), 28-45. DOI: 10.23960/jppk.v10.i2.2021.03
Yulianti, T & Sulistiyawati, A. (2020). The Blended Learning for Student’s Character Building. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 422, 56-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.089
Nuryasintia, I & Wibowo, L Adi. (2018). Learning Activeness through Learning Media and Class Management. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, vol. 65, 145-148. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icebef-18.2019.35
Singgih, E.E. (2006). Sukses Belajar di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Panduan.
Richards, Jack C. (2015). TECHNOLOGY IN LANGUAGE TEACHING TODAY. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 18-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v10i1.1506
Setyawan, Harits. (2019). BLENDED METHOD: ONLINE-OFFLINE TEACHING AND LEARNING, ON STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12 (1), 22-33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v12i1.4432
Miller, M. D. (2019). Redefining Learning Spaces: The Impact of Physical Classroom Design on Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 961-978.
Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning—parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press, 17(2), 163-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000224
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
Chen, C. H., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.1.3
Gea, Otomosi et al. (2023). The Description of Students’ Problem in Learning Vocabulary through Flash Card at Tenth Grade of SMK Negeri 1 Tuhemberua in 2022/2023. Journal on Education, 06(01), 8403-8409. http://jonedu.org/index.php/joe
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Hafeez, M & Akhter, Y. (2021). Effects of Blended Learning in Comparison of Traditional Learning to Provide Safer Learning Environment- A Comparative Review. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2(6), 1604-1615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i6.209
Halasa, S & Abusalim, N. (2020). Comparing Student Achievement in Traditional Learning with a Combination of Blended and Flipped Learning. Nursing Open, 7(4), 1129-1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.492
Aji, M. P. Permana. (2017). ENGLISH LISTENING BLENDED LEARNING: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN TEACHING LISTENING TO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 2(1), 25-32. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/KLS/article/view/5349/3530
Vickers, R., Field, J., & Melakoski, C. (2015). Media Culture 2020: Collaborative Teaching and Blended Learning Using Social Media and Cloud-Based Technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1), 62-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6139