Komparasi Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe Pencocokan Kartu Indeks dengan Model Ceramah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi di Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 3 Kerinci

Main Article Content

Yeva Lenda Mahyastuti

Abstract

This study aims to find a significant difference of learning outcomes between active learning model types matching index cards and lecture method on learning outcomes geography in class XI IPS SMAN 3 Kerinci. The working hypothesis (H1) stated is "There are differences in learning outcomes of students use active learning model types matching index cards in the eye of learning geography class XI IPS SMAN 3 Kerinci". This type of research is classified in experimental research with the final data analysis method using t-test to test the differences between the mean values for the two samples. The study sample as many as 28 students for each class of two classes selected by cluster random sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire that has been tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed by using the Microsoft Excel program. The findings of this study is a significant difference between the active learning model types matching index cards to student learning outcomes. Based on the above results and scores thitung 5,51 ttable of 1.71 (0.05; 26) with an average value of the index card matching method amounted to 83.93 and 79.82 by conventional methods. Based on these findings it can be concluded that the active learning model types matching index cards directly affect the outcome of learning geography students at SMAN 3 Kerinci. Implications of this research is the active learning model types matching the index card can be used as one of the models in the learning eye geografiuntuk improve learning outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mahyastuti, Y. (2022). Komparasi Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe Pencocokan Kartu Indeks dengan Model Ceramah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi di Kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 3 Kerinci. Journal on Education, 4(4), 1209-1213. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v4i4.535
Section
Articles

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1999. Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Arsyad, Azhar. 2010. Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arifin, Zainal. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Haryono, dan Hadi, Amirul. 1998. .Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Hakim, Lukman. 2009. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV.Wancana Prima.
Hanafiah, Nanang. dan Suhana, cucu. 2012. Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Hariyanto, Suryono. 2012. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hamzah, Mohamad Nurdin. 2012. Belajar Dengan Pendekatan Pailkem. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kunandar. 2013. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rohani, Ahmad. 2010. Pengelolaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.
Rusman. 2012. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Perdada.
Sabri, Ahmad. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Ciputat: Quantum Teaching.
Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suprijono, Agus. 2012. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Silberman, L. dan Melvin.2013. Active learning.