Kriteria E-Learning Untuk Pembelajaran SMA/MA Berdasarkan Quality Matters Rubric (QMR) K-12

Main Article Content

Shintia Putri Riski
Relsas Yogica

Abstract

E-learning is one of the innovations in education that is widely used. The quality of E-learning greatly influences the quality of learning. This article aims to describe good e-learning criteria for high school/MA online learning according to the Quality Matters Rubric (QMR) K-12 standard. The research was conducted using the library research method with content analysis data analysis techniques. The results show that good E-learning for learning based on QMR must meet certain specified standards. This standard is divided into 8 general standards: general description & introduction, objectives and competencies, assessment & measurement, teaching materials, learning activities & student interaction, technology, student & teacher support, and accessibility and usability. General standards are divided into several special standards that explain in more detail related to general standards.

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri Riski, S., & Yogica, R. (2023). Kriteria E-Learning Untuk Pembelajaran SMA/MA Berdasarkan Quality Matters Rubric (QMR) K-12. Journal on Education, 6(1), 7648-7661. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.4082
Section
Articles

References

APJII. 2022. Profil Internet Indonesia 2022. Jakarta.
Ashari, Zakiah Mohamad, Alifa Aliya Ngadiman, Nurul Farhana Zainudin, and Nurul Farhana Jumaat. 2018. “The Relationship between Knowledge and Attitude towards Technology Gadget Usage with Students’ Socio-Emotions Development.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 12(7). doi: 10.3991/ijim.v12i7.9711.
Boettcher, Judith, and Rita-Marie Conrad. 2016. The Online Teaching Survival Guide. San Fransisco: John Willey & Sons.
Cifuentes, Lauren. 2021. A Guide to Administering Distance Learning. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill.
Clark, Ruth Colvin, and Richard E. Mayer. 2016. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction Important: Fourth Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Collaboration Academy Indonesia. 2022. “Codemi Learning Annual Report 2021.” Retrieved November 8, 2022 (https://codemi.co.id/codemi-learning-annual-report-2021/).
Diskominfo. 2020. “Peranan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Dunia Pendidikan.” Retrieved November 29, 2022 (https://diskominfo.kedirikab.go.id/baca/peranan-teknologi-informasi-dalam-dunia-pendidikan).
Djulia, ELy, Hasruddin Hasruddin, Widya Arwita, Zulkifli Simatupang, Wasis Wuyung Wisnu Brata, and Aryeni Aryeni. 2020. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Biologi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Elaasri, Rachid, and Abdelmajid Bouziane. 2019. “Applying the Quality Matters (Qm)TM Rubric To Analyze the Quality of Ent Platform Courses.” European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies 0(0):12–22. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3546467.
Fatira, Marlya, Satya Darmayani, SandiranaJulianan Nendissa, Opan Arifudin, DIna Anggaraeini, Rudy Hidana, Nurhana Marantika, Nur Arisah, Nazaruddin Ahmad, Rinanda Febriani, and FebriaSri Handayani. 2021. PEMBELAJARAN DIGITAL. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung.
Gallup. 2019. Education Technology Use in Schools Student and Educator Perspectives.
Gumelar, Dian Rachmat, and Sri Sophiarani Dinnur. 2020. “Digitalisasi Pendidikan Hukum Dan Prospeknya Pasca Pandemi Covid-19.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam 1(2):111–22. doi: 10.15575/as.v1i2.9909.
Gupta, Satinder Bal, and Monika Gupta. 2020. “Technology and E-Learning in Higher Education.” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 29(4).
Hotsuite, and We Are Social. 2022. “Digital 2022: Another Year Of Bumper Growth - We Are Social UK.” We Are Social. Retrieved March 26, 2023 (https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/).
Istikhomah H, Indarto A.S, DT. P. S. 2014. “Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Media Pembelajaran E-Learning.” E-Journal Akbidiyo II:107–14.
Matter Quality. 2022. “Quality Matters.” Retrieved September 17, 2022 (https://www.qualitymatters.org/why-quality-matters/about-qm).
Matters, Quality. 2019. “Quality Matters Rubric K-12 5th Edition.” Retrieved July 26, 2023 (https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/k-12-publisher-rubric).
Oxford, Dictionary. n.d. “Digitalization Noun - Definition, Pictures, Pronunciation and Usage Notes | Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.Com.” Retrieved August 28, 2022 (https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/digitalization?q=digitalization).
Prawiradilaga, Dewi Salma. 2016. Mozaik Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Qi, Qinglin, and Fei Tao. 2018. “Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison.” IEEE Access 6:3585–93. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265.
Rusli, Muhammad, Dadang Hermawan, and Nyoman Supuwiningsih. 2020. Memahami E-Learning. Yogyakarta: ANDI OFFSET.
Rusli, Muhammad, Hermawan Dadang, and Nyoman Ni Supuwiningsih. 2020. Memahami E-Learning - Google Books. Yogyakarta: ANDI OFFSET.
Setyarini, Merlina Dewi, Sri Widowati, and Dawam Dwi Jatmiko Suwawi. 2015. “Analisis Kualitas Blended Learning Menggunakan Rubric Quality Matters (Studi Kasus €“ Telkom-Pjj).” EProceedings of Engineering 2(2).
Smith, Robert Elliott. 2019. Rage Inside the Machine. London: Bloomsbury.
Starkey, Louise. 2020. “A Review of Research Exploring Teacher Preparation for the Digital Age.” Cambridge Journal of Education 50(1):37–56.
Widiyono, Aan, and Izzah Millati. 2021. “Peran Teknologi Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Merdeka Belajar Di Era 4.0.” Journal of Education and Teaching (JET) 2(1). doi: 10.51454/jet.v2i1.63.
Al Zumor, Abdul Wahed Q. 2015. “Quality Matters Rubric Potential for Enhancing Online Foreign Language Education.” International Education Studies 8(4):173–78. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n4p173.