Analisis Konsep, Teori dan Lingkup Politik Pendidikan

  • Dessi Asdrayany UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Muhamad Najmi Muhajir UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Anis Fauzi UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Ahmad Qurtubi UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Keywords: Concept, Theory and Scope of Educational Politics

Abstract

This research uses a qualitative research type with a library research approach by digging up information through the literature regarding concepts, theories and the political scope of education to answer the focus of the study in this study. This study examines political concepts, political theory, political spheres and educational politics. Education is an effort to develop the human potentials of students, both their physical potential, their creative potential, taste and intention, so that this potential becomes real and can function in their life journey. The basis of education is a universal human ideal. Education aims to prepare a personal balance, unity. organic, harmonious, dynamic. in order to achieve the goals of human life. This can be understood considering that the higher the opportunity for a person or society to get an education, the higher the opportunity for a person or society to read, compare, evaluate, as well as criticize the space of ideals and political reality. Thus, the key to public political education actually lies in the politics of public education. Educational politics are all policies of the government of a country in the field of education in the form of laws or other regulations to organize education in order to achieve the goals of the country. The educational politics (siyâsah atta‘lîm) of a country is largely determined by the ideology (view of life) that the country carries.

References

Almond, G. & Powell, G.B. Jr. (1996). Comparative Politics today: A world view.6th ed. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
Budiardjo Miriam Budiardjo. 2008. “Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik”, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-dasar Ilmu politik, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Chilcote, R. (1981). Theories of Comparative Politics: The search of Paradigm. Colorado: West View Press.
Craib, I. (1984). Modern social theories: from Habermas to Parsons, terj.
H.A.R. Tilaar. (2003). Kekuasaan dan Pendidikan. Magelang: Indonesia Tera.
Kencana Inu Syafiie dan Azhari, 2009. “Sistem Politik Indonesia” Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, Cetakan Ketiga.
Landman, T. (2000). Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An introduction. London, New York: Routledge.
Macridis, R.C. (1983). Contemporary Political Ideologies: movements and regimes. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Magnis-Suseno. (1987). Etika politik: Prinsip-prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta
Nata Abuddin. 2003. Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta: Pranada Media.
Rueschmeyer, D. et.al. (1992). Capitalist Development dan Democracy. Chicago: Chicago Press.
S. Simamora (1986). Jakarta: CV Rajawali. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 2nd ed. Sage Publications. Goodin, R.E dan Klingemann, H. eds. (1996). A new Handbook
Sindhunata,Editor. (2000), Menggagas Paradigma baru Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Widyanto Indra. (2022). Respons kebijakan desentralisasi dalam penyelenggaraan urusan pendidikan menengah di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Politik Indonesia. 8(12). 133-142 doi: 10.20473/jpi.v8i2.39940
Zurinal Z dan Wahdi Sayuti. 2006. Ilmu Pendidikan .Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press.
Published
2023-07-07
How to Cite
Asdrayany, D., Najmi Muhajir, M., Fauzi, A., & Qurtubi, A. (2023). Analisis Konsep, Teori dan Lingkup Politik Pendidikan, 6(1), 6840-6852. Retrieved from https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/3912

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>