Pengembangan Scaffolding pada Discovery Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah

Main Article Content

Munawir Nursyahrobby
M. Rusdi
Diah Riski Gusti

Abstract

Scaffolding is a help given to students to learn and solve problems. This study aims to describe scaffolding development procedures in discovery learning to improve problem-solving skills. The research method used is a research procedure to develop a learning design model with the type F2-O1+O2-S1+S5+S6-A3. The data was collected using the Delphi technique and analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods. Based on the validation results by experts and practitioners, the product is declared suitable for learning. The results of small group trials show that the product effectively improves students' problem-solving abilities in learning activities. Applying scaffolding products in discovery learning can improve students' problem-solving skills at reaction rates.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nursyahrobby, M., Rusdi, M., & Gusti, D. R. (2023). Pengembangan Scaffolding pada Discovery Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Journal on Education, 6(1), 6188-6199. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3821
Section
Articles

References

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery - based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Ananda, P. D., & Atmojo, S. E. (2022). The impact of the discovery learning model on problem - solving ability and scientific attitude of elementary school teacher education students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i2.47684
Cahyono, A. N. (2010). Vygotskian perspective: Proses scaffolding untuk mencapai zone of proximal development (ZPD) peserta didik dalam pembelajaran matematika. 442–448. www.labvirtualschool.adinegara.com
Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Suranto, & Rahardjo, S. B. (2020). The potential of discovery learning models to empower students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1464(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012036
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2010). Guided instruction: How to develop confident and successful learners. ASCD. www.ascd.org/books
Hosnan, M. (2016). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Ghalia Indonesia.
Hulukati, E., Zakiyah, S., & Rustam, A. (2018). The Effect of guided discovery learning model with superitem test on students’ problem-solving ability in mathematics. Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v5i2.13406
Jana, P., & Fahmawati, A. A. N. (2020). Model discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2157
Kemendikbud. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (No. 36). https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/Permendikbud36-2018K13SMA-MALengkap.pdf
Khasinah, S. (2021). Discovery Learning: Definisi, Sintaksis, Keunggulan dan Kelemahan. Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jm.v11i3.5821
Kolomuç, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ misconceptions concerning concept of chemical reaction rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84–101. http://www.eurasianjournals.com/index.php/ejpce
Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills? Learning and Instruction, 60, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007
Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2014). A methodological framework for instructional design model development: Critical dimensions and synthesized procedures. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9352-7
Mamin, R. (2008). Penerapan metode pembelajaran scaffolding pada pokok bahasan sistem periodik unsur. Jurnal Chemica, 10(2), 55–60. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/chemica/article/view/420/36
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three - strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
Ni’mah, M., Subandi, & Munzil. (2020). Keefektifan pembelajaran POGIL dengan strategi konflik kognitif untuk mengurangi miskonsepsi pada materi laju reaksi kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1257–1264. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Nuryani, D., & Handayani, I. (2020). Kompetensi Guru di Era 4.0 dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 224–237.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results.
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it; a new aspect of mathematical method. Prinston University.
Rusdi, M. (2019). Penelitian desain dan pengembangan kependidikan: Konsep, prosedur dan sintesis pengetahuan baru. Rajawali Pers.
Simanjuntak, D., Napitupulu, E. E., Manullang, M., Manalu, R., & Sinambela, L. (2018). The enhancement difference of student mathematical problem solving ability between guided discovery learning model and direct learning model. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 1688–1692. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-12-15
Slavin, R. E. (1997). Cooperative Learning and Student Diversity. In R. Ben-Ari & Y. Rich (Eds.), Enhancing Education in Heterogeneous Schools: Theory and Application. Bar-Ilan University.
Syahri, W., Muhaimin, & Ardi, A. M. (2016). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif berbasis representasi kimia pada materi laju reaksi untuk siswa kelas XI SMAN 4 Kota Jambi. J. Indo. Soc. Integ. Chem, 8(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v9i1.5081
Trianto. (2014). Model pembelajaran terpadu: Konsep, strategi, dan implementasinya dalam kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP) (F. Yustianti, Ed.; 1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 1–11.
Yuriev, E., Naidu, S., Schembri, L. S., & Short, J. L. (2017). Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry: Guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00009j