Evaluasi Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Tengah Semester dalam Pembelajaran Tematik untuk Kelas V di SDN Gladak Anyar 4 Pamekasan

Main Article Content

Ria Kasanova
Roni Sulistiyono

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the validity, level of difficulty, discriminating power, effectiveness of the distractor, and reliability of multiple choice questions in the Mid Semester Assessment in fifth grade thematic learning at SDN Gladak Anyar 4 Pamekasan. The research method used is a quantitative descriptive approach. There are two themes in the Mid Semester Examination Questions, namely theme 6 with 20 questions and theme 7 with 19 questions. Evaluation of the validity of the questions, level of difficulty, discriminating power, effectiveness of the distractor, and reliability was carried out using Microsoft Excel 2010. The subjects of this study were fifth grade students, and data collection was carried out using documentation techniques. The results of this study indicate that the quality of the questions is high. (1) The validity of the questions in theme 6 were 19 questions (95%) and in theme 7 were 18 questions (94.74%) declared valid. (2) The difficulty level of the questions in theme 6 consisted of 13 questions (68.42%) which were categorized as easy and 2 questions (10.53%) which were categorized as difficult. In theme 7, there are 11 questions (61.11%) which are categorized as easy, so there are questions with difficulty levels that do not meet good quality. (3) The discriminating power of questions on theme 6 consisted of 10 items (52.63%) which were categorized as poor and 1 item (5.26%) which were categorized as good. In theme 7, there are 6 items (33.33%) which are categorized as not good and 3 items (16.67%) which are categorized as good. Therefore, the questions fall into the category of moderate discriminating power. (4) The effectiveness of the distractor in theme 6 consisted of 1 item (5.26%) which was categorized as very good, 8 items (42.11%) which were categorized as good, and 6 items (31.58%) which were categorized as poor. In theme 7, there were 4 items (22.22%) which were categorized as very good, 4 items (22.22%) which were categorized as good, and 3 items (16.67%) which were categorized as poor. Thus, the questions fall into the category of the effectiveness of a good distractor. (5) The reliability of the questions in theme 6 is 0.9592, while in theme 7 it is 0.8950, indicating that the questions have high reliability and high quality.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kasanova, R., & Sulistiyono, R. (2023). Evaluasi Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Tengah Semester dalam Pembelajaran Tematik untuk Kelas V di SDN Gladak Anyar 4 Pamekasan. Journal on Education, 6(1), 5820-5834. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3773
Section
Articles

References

Amarila, R. S., Subali, B., & Saptono, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Tema Lingkungan. Jurnal Improvement, 8(1), 82–91.
Dewi Widyaningrum, M., & Sulistya Wardani, N. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Tematik (PS) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i1.24385
Fauzi, A., & Pradipta, I. W. (2018). Research methods and data analysis techniques in education articles published by Indonesian biology educational journals. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5889
Gomboo, A., Gombo, B., Munkhgerel, T., Nyamjav, S., & Badamdorj, O. (2019). Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions in Medical Licensing Examination. Cent Asian J Med Sci, 5(2), 141–148.
Kundu, S., Ughade, J. M., Sherke, A. R., Kanwar, Y., Tiwari, S., Jatwar, R., Gurudiwan, R., & Kundu, S. G. (2020). Impact Measurement on Medical Faculty for Adhering to Appropriate Guidelines in Framing Effective Multiple-Choice Questions for Item Analysis. Journal of Medical Education, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5812/jme.103482
Mahmudah, R., Pramudya, Y., & Sulisworo, D. (2016). Analisis Validitas Butir Soal Certainty of Respons Index (Cri) Untuk Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Tata Surya Dan Fenomena Astronomi. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains 2016 (pp. 1–15).
Maulidiyah, F., Widarti, H. R., & Utomo, Y. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Konsep Mahasiswa Kimia Pada Kajian Pokok Hidrolisis Garam Menggunakan Tes Pilihan Ganda Empat Tingkat. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(7), 1044. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i7.14921
Mukarromah, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Model Discovery Learning Berdasarkan Pembelajaran Tematik. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v2i1.11844
Oktarina, N., & Armariena, D. N. (2020). Analisis Soal Tipe Higher Other Thinking Skills (Hots) Pada Tes Objektf Pilihan Ganda Usbn Bahasa Indonesia Sd/Mi. Wahana Didaktika : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 18(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.31851/wahanadidaktika.v18i2.4374
Permatasari, D., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Index Card Match Terhadap Kemampuan Mehamami Soal Cerita Matematika Siswa Kelas IV SDN Rambutan 02. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 3192–3202. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1543
Sari, R. M. M., Luritawaty, I. P., Dahlan, J. A., & Siregar, G. M. A. (2020). ANALISIS SOAL UJIAN SEKOLAH BERSTANDAR NASIONAL MATEMATIKA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 4(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v4i2.1862
Stephenson, C. R., Bonnes, S. L., Sawatsky, A. P., Richards, L. W., Schleck, C. D., Mandrekar, J. N., Beckman, T. J., & Wittich, C. M. (2020). The relationship between learner engagement and teaching effectiveness: a novel assessment of student engagement in continuing medical education. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02331-x
Ujang Charda S. (2021). Typology of Legal Research Methods in Normative and Sociological Thinking. Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v12i1.769
Warju, W., Ariyanto, S. R., Soeryanto, S., & Trisna, R. A. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Tipe Hots Pada Kompetensi Sistem Rem Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v17i1.22914
Wulansari Ramadhany, F., Hakim, A., & Sulaeman, N. (2022). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke dengan Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual PhET (The Physics education Technology). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v3i2.1477
Yue, C., & Xu, X. (2019). Review of Quantitative Methods Used in Chinese Educational Research, 1978–2018. ECNU Review of Education, 2(4), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119886692