Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah Kelas XI MIA SMAN 1 Tinambung
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is a descriptive study aimed at determining the cognitive abilities of students in the process dimension and knowledge dimension based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy on the topic of Circulatory System for Grade XI Science students at SMAN 1 Tinambung. Understanding students' cognitive abilities is important for maximizing higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) as well as developing authentic learning plans and evaluation tools. The research instrument used was a cognitive ability test based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. The research data were obtained by analyzing the Biology Lesson Implementation Plan for Grade XI Science and by administering a cognitive ability test to the students. The data analysis technique used was descriptive statistics. Based on the analysis of the Lesson Implementation Plan, the cognitive abilities taught by the teacher were as follows: C1 (Remembering) 68.75%, C2 (Understanding) 18.75%, and C4 (Analyzing) 12.50%, as well as factual knowledge 62.50% and conceptual knowledge 37.50%. The conclusion drawn from the results of the students' cognitive ability test based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy for multiple-choice questions is as follows: C1 (Remembering) 68.42%, C2 (Understanding) 46.05%, C3 (Applying) 21.05%, C4 (Analyzing) 60.53%, and C5 (Evaluating) 26.32%, as well as factual knowledge 57.89% and conceptual knowledge 51.32%. For essay questions, the percentage of student scores in each level is as follows: C1 40.24%, C2 53.25%, C3 58.88%, C4 51.08%, and C5 30.43%, as well as factual knowledge 52.73% and conceptual knowledge 48.19%.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Kedua). Bumi Aksara.
Ewing, J. C., & Whittington, M. S. (2009). Describing The Cognitive Level of Professor Discourse and Student Cognition in College of Agriculture Class Sessions. In Journal of Agricultural Education (Vol. 36, Issue 4).
Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s Taxonomy. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology (pp. 41–47). Jacob Foundation.
Haataja, E. S. H., Tolvanen, A., Vilppu, H., Kallio, M., Peltonen, J., & Metsäpelto, R. L. (2023). Measuring higher-order cognitive skills with multiple choice questions –potentials and pitfalls of Finnish teacher education entrance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103943
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Krau, S. D. (2011). Creating Educational Objectives for Patient Education Using the New Bloom’s Taxonomy. In Nursing Clinics of North America (Vol. 46, Issue 3, pp. 299–312). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2011.05.002
Masitah, S. (2011). Profil Kemampuan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Uji Kompetensi Tertulis (UKT) berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif pada Olimpiade Sains Biologi SMP-SMA Se-Riau Tahun 2010. Universitas Negeri Riau.
Sanjaya, W. (2009). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Tíjaro-Rojas, R., Arce-Trigatti, A., Cupp, J., Pascal, J., & Arce, P. E. (2016). A Systematic and Integrative Sequence Approach (SISA) for mastery learning: Anchoring Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy to student learning. Education for Chemical Engineers, 17, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2016.06.001
Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K., & Pellikka, A. (2020). Geography tests in the Finnish Matriculation Examination in paper and digital forms – An analysis of questions based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100896
Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. Didaktis, 4(2), 61–69.
Widodo, A. (2006). Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir Soal. In Buletin Puspendik (Vol. 3, Issue 2).