Dampak Kebijakan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum (PTN BH) yang Mengakibatkan Munculnya Komersialisasi Pendidikan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Education in the realm of public tertiary institutions is the choice for many people, this is seen because public tertiary institutions are more prestigious than private tertiary institutions. State universities are also known for their good quality of education compared to private universities, even though not all private universities are lower in position than state universities, there are also many private universities whose quality of education is already good and commensurate with state universities. However, state universities are not without problems regarding their education, the birth of the Legal Entity State University (PTN BH) policy seems to indicate new problems for candidates and students. The publication of PTN BH has brought a new issue to the surface regarding the commercialization of education in the realm of state universities, this problem has an impact on underprivileged students due to the high costs of education. Because of these issues, here the researcher intends to describe problems regarding the commercialization of education in Legal Entity State Universities with existing data.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Darmaningtyas, (2004). Pendidikan yang Memiskinkan, Yogyakarta: Galang Press
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2003).Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2003 : Tentang Sis¬tem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Eko Prasetyo. (2005). Orang Miskin Dilarang Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Resist Book.
EN, Staff. (2020). Pasal 65 UU Cipta Kerja Sangat Berbahaya Bagi Dunia Pendidikan. LMND. Diakses dari: https://www.lmnd.or.id/berita/pasal-65-uu-cipta-kerja-sangat-berbahaya-bagi-dunia-pendidikan.html
Freire, Paulo. (2002). Politik Pendidikan, Kebudayaan Kekuasaan dan Pembebasan, Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Gunawan, Arif. (2019). Dana Pendidikan 20% APBN, Kualitas Output Kok Kalah Bersaing?. CNBC Indonesia. Diakses dari: https://www.cnbcindone-sia.com/news/20190801230921-4-89264/dana-pendidikan-20-apbn-kualitas-output-kok-kalah-bersaing
Herlina, Neni. (2022). Transformasi PTN BH Menuju Kampus Unggul dan Berdaya Saing. Ke-mendikbud. Diakses dari: https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/kabar-dikti/ka¬bar/transformasi-ptn-bh-menuju-kampus-unggul-dan-berdaya-saing/
Indrajit, R. Eko, dan R. Djokopranoto. (2006). Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Modern. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Lexy, J. Moleong. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution. (1996). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
S. Margono. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Cet. 2. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
S.J., J Sudarminta. Postmodernisme dan Komersialisasi Pendidikan Tinggi. dalam Globalisasi danPemanfaatan Teknologi Industri: Tantangan dan Peluang bagi Perguruan Tinggi, Yogyakarta: APTIK.
Sinovia, LPM. (2020). Sempurnanya Komersialisasi Dunia Pendidikan, PTN-BH. Diakses dari: https://med.unhas.ac.id/sinovia/2020/02/25/sempurnanya-komersialisasi-dunia-pendidikan-ptn-bh/
Undang-undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Pasal 31 Ayat 1
Wahono, F. (2001). Kapitalisme Pendidikan Antara Kompetisi dan Keadilan. Penerbit INSIST Press
Wibowo, A. (2008). Malpraktik Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.
Yamin, Moh. (2009). Menggugat Pendidikan Indonesia: Belajar dari Paulo Freire dan Ki Hajar Dewantara. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.