Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Online dan Offline pada Mata Kuliah Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Program Studi Kebidanan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Because of the Covid-19 outbreak, educational institutions must continue to provide instruction while adhering to health procedures. Distance online learning is one type of learning innovation practised. The implementation of this type of learning has both advantages and problems, particularly for students learning outside of their primary education major, as in this study, specifically students in the Midwifery study programme learning English. The purpose of this study is to determine the outcomes of online learning, such as student opinions and satisfaction, and to compare the results of learning outcomes between online and online learning in English courses. This research utilized a mixed method, with quantitative data supplemented by in-depth interviews with students enrolled in online programmes. This study included 20 students from the Midwifery study programme, with data gathered from secondary sources on students who had participated in offline learning before the pandemic (20 students) and primary sources received from students who participated in online learning. There was no significant difference in the average value of student learning outcomes between online and non-online, according to the findings. The majority of students are happy with the many types and methods of online learning. Further research on the clarity of learning outcomes is required, with larger samples and more detailed variables.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Awan, M., Bhaumik, A., Hassan, S., & Haq, I. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic, outbreak educational sector and students online learning in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 23, 23.
Dube, B. (2020). Rural online learning in the context of COVID 19 in South Africa: Evoking an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607
Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020). Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mpungose, C. B. (2020). Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African University in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00603-x
Nassar Hassen, M. (2020). The Challenges and Prospects of Using E-learning among EFL Students in Bisha University. Arab World English Journal, 11, 124–137. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.11
Raihan. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian. Universitas Islam Jakarta.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Segbenya, M., Bervell, B., Minadzi, V. M., & Somuah, B. A. (2022). Modelling the perspectives of distance education students towards online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. In Smart Learning Environments (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00193-y
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
Turan, Z., Kucuk, S., & Cilligol Karabey, S. (2022). The university students’ self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00342-w