Evaluasi Keberlanjutan Sistem Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Terpusat Skala Komunal
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In previous research, several Communal SPALD-T/IPAL at SANIMAS Cimahi city were still in a less sustainable status in terms of financing, technical and social aspects. One of them occurred in the SANIMAS RW 10 and 16 Kelurahan Cibabat program which had problems with technical SOPs, community participation and difficult access. While in SANIMAS RW 19 there were problems with the management organization sector that was not optimal. With management conditions like this, challenges in management have also increased because the Indonesian government has implemented various "lockdown" restriction policies to prevent the spread of COVID-19 which has had quite a large impact on the city of Cimahi in 2020-2021. The RAPFISH assessment method (RAPWastman) is used by researchers to analyze each aspect of sustainability multidimensionally based on various indicators and provide a percentage value for the level of sustainability. The results of the analysis are then combined with a quantitative SWOT analysis as a tool to formulate a strategy for handling or developing SANIMAS. Based on the assessment of the results of the analysis, the sustainability of SANIMAS in the technical aspect is at the moderate to sustainable level (69%-81%), in the financing aspect is at the sufficient to sustainable level (59%-76%), in the environmental aspect at the sustainable level (78%-81 %), on the institutional aspect at the moderate to sustainable level (72%-87%), and on the social aspect at the moderate to sustainable level (67%-76%). The general strategy for optimizing the management of SANIMAS RW 10, 16 and RW 19 is to maximize the application of SOPs, access to spare parts, community involvement and assistance or training facilities from the government to maximize service quality and sustainability of SANIMAS management from various aspects.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bahar, E., Sudarno, dan Zaman, B. (2017): Sustainability study of domestic communal wastewater treatment plant in Surabaya City, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 70, 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012012
Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., dan McAlpine, P. (2006): Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management, Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009
Kordana, S. (2017): SWOT analysis of wastewater heat recovery systems application, E3S Web of Conferences, 17, 00042. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171700042
Liberda, R., Apriani, I., dan Utomo, K. P. (2021): Studi Benchmarking Unit Sistem Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Terpusat (SPALDT) Program SANIMAS IDB di Kota Pontianak, Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 19(2), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.19.2.465-478
Lofty, J., Berthanilla, R., dan Sururi, A. (2021): Implementasi Program Sanitasi Berbasis Masyarakat di Kecamatan Kasemen Kota Serang, Pamator Journal, 14(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v14i2.10975
McGranahan, G., dan Mitlin, D. (2016): Learning from Sustained Success: How Community-Driven Initiatives to Improve Urban Sanitation Can Meet the Challenges, World Development, 87, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.019
Møller, K. A., Fryd, O., De Neergaard, A., dan Magid, J. (2012): Economic, environmental and socio-cultural sustainability of three constructed wetlands in Thailand, Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247811434259
Mulyatna, L., Pradiko, H., dan Abdurahman, D. (t.t.): EVALUASI KINERJA PROGRAM SANITASI BERBASIS MASYARAKAT (SANIMAS) DALAM SEKTOR AIR LIMBAH (STUDI DI KABUPATEN SELUMA PROVINSI BENGKULU TAHUN 2012-2015), 1(1), 9.
Popovic, T., Kraslawski, A., dan Avramenko, Y. (2013): Applicability of Sustainability Indicators to Wastewater Treatment Processes, 931–936 dalam Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63234-0.50156-1
Setiawati, E., Notodarmojo, S., Soewondo, P., Effendi, A. J., dan Otok, B. W. (2013): Infrastructure Development Strategy for Sustainable Wastewater System by using SEM Method (Case Study Setiabudi and Tebet Districts, South Jakarta), Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.085
Singhirunnusorn, W., dan Stenstrom, M. K. (2009): Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indictor assessment in Thailand, Water Science and Technology, 59(9), 1873–1884. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.215
Starkl, M., Brunner, N., Das, S., dan Singh, A. (2022): Sustainability Assessment for Wastewater Treatment Systems in Developing Countries, Water, 14(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020241
Sugiyono. (2013): Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Susilawati, S., Falefi, R., dan Purwoko, A. (2020): Impact of COVID-19’s Pandemic on the Economy of Indonesia, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.954
Wirawan, S. M. S., Maarif, M. S., Riani, E., dan Anwar, S. (2018): An evaluation of the sustainability of domestic wastewater management in DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10(3), 13.