Analisis Kemampuan Beripikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP

  • Siti Elva Hepzibah IKIP SIliwangi
  • Luvy Sylviana Zanthy IKIP SIliwangi
Keywords: Mathematical Creative Thinking, Action Research Classroom

Abstract

Mathematical learning is given at each stage, taught so that students can use mathematics as a way of reasoning. The reality in the field of education in schools is more about students' intelligence for the development of student creativity. Meanwhile, it is equally important to achieve student success in learning. Students are asked to process information about processing information. Here the teacher gives freedom to students in expressing opinions in the learning process. This freedom can be realized with students who are given the freedom to solve mathematical problems in various ways. In learning mathematics at a private junior high school in Bandung, specifically on the subject of straight line and gradient equations, students find it difficult to understand the meaning of straight line and gradient stories, difficulties in understanding methods and still confused which method to use to answer questions question given by the teacher. So the classroom action research (CAR) was held to improve students' mathematical thinking skills using open consent, this study was conducted with 2 cycles and 8 meetings. The results of this study indicate that students can improve the quality of the test results tested in each test. In addition, the average value of the initial test results of 17.5 then increased to 64.75 on the results of the first cycle test, then increased again to 74.72222 on the results of the cycle II test. This shows an increase in the ability of Grade VIII students at Mutiara 4 Bandung Middle School can be improved through open agreement.

References

Hamalik, O. (2001). Proses belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Hamzah (2000). Pembelajaran Matematika I. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hasibuan, R. I (2014). Penerapan Pendekatan Open-Ended untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel di Kelas VIII SMP Swasta Muhammadiyah 25 Rantauprapat Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. [Online].
Hendriana, H, dan Afrilianto,M. (2017). Langkah Praktis Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru. Bandung : Rafika Aditama.
Sawada, T. (1997). Developing Lesson Plans.dalam J. P. Becker dan S. Shima-da(ed) The Open-Ended Approach: a New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. NCTM.
Simbolon, H. M. R. (2014). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelas dan Open-Ended Questions untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 2 Bengkulu [Online]. Tersedia di: http://repository.unib.ac.id/8736/1/I%2CII%2CIII%2CII-14-her.FK.pdf. Diakses 2 Januari 2018
Sudjana, N. (2000). Dasar- Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar.Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Takasago, M. (1997). Example of Teaching in Elementary Schools. dalam J. P. Becker dan S. Shimada(ed) The Open-Ended Approach: a New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. NCTM
Wardhani, I.G.A.K, dan Wihardit, K. (2016). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Tanggerang Selatan:Universitas Terbuka.
Published
2019-04-15
How to Cite
Hepzibah, S., & Zanthy, L. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Beripikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP. Journal on Education, 1(3), 349-354. Retrieved from http://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/173

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>